Saturday, 18 August 2007

The Malaysian Image

This article made it into the papers here today.Is this true?

From The Times
August 18, 2007

Islam’s war on sin dims bright lights in a nation torn between cultures

Over a drink of green coconut at what used to be called the Passionate Love Beach until his Islamist party came to power and scrapped the name, state minister Takiyuddin Hassan outlines the victories in the war on sin.
To the south, in Kuala Lumpur, the capital, celebrations are starting for Malaysia’s 50th year as an independent state. Its proud achievements are modern universities, a buoyant economy and a respected place in the world as a moderate Islamic nation.
Mr Hassan’s party boasts a different set of achievements: banning mini-skirts, chastising unmarried couples and renaming Kota Bharu’s favourite beauty spot. They also closed down nightclubs, banned nearly all bars except a few Chinese restaurants, where no Muslims are allowed, and refused to let a proposed cinema open unless there were separate sections for men and women.
In a sign of their clout, the American pop diva Gwen Stefani has agreed to wear traditional costumes in her Malaysian concert next week after conservative Muslim youths protested at the “indecent dressing and obscenity” of her skin-baring act. An Islamic opposition party demanded that her show next Tuesday should be cancelled.
The platinum blonde star has agreed to cover up in the hope of heading off further protests.
As it celebrates 50 years of independence on August 31, Malaysia is once again debating just how Islamic it should be. Older Malays bemoan a younger generation that has become puritanical, self-righteously declining to attend social functions where alcohol is served. Headscarves, rare 20 years ago, are worn by almost all Malay women now, although often in combination with tight jeans.
As for Mr Hassan, a moderate who was once a lawyer, he is proud of his party’s achievements in Kota Bharu. He says that it has kept the rustic capital of Kelantan state upright and clean-living. The biggest building in the city is a gigantic headquarters decorated with concrete Korans where the moral enforcement department is based. Its bearded officials spend much of their time prowling parks in Kota Bharu in search of amorous young sinners.
Mr Hassan is sensitive about the mocking nickname of “Taleban lite” sometimes levelled at his party from Kuala Lumpur, where bars do a roaring trade and the cinemas are full of dating couples. Yet he is sure that the moral example set in Kota Bharu will some day win over his lax compatriots to the south. “Malaysia is a Muslim state. We hope we can change the mindset of our people in Kuala Lumpur so they can live according to Islamic principles too,” he said. Not all parties agree.
Some fear that assertive Islam threatens to upset the delicate balance between the 60 per cent Malay Muslim majority and the nonMuslim ethnic Chinese and Indian minorities, which have managed to coexist, sometimes uneasily, since the troubled birth of the country in 1957, at a time of civil war and ethnic tension.
At the time many feared that the new nation was doomed to failure. It has instead built a strong economy and an imperfect democracy, dominated for 50 years by the United Malays National Organisation, which has survived without the coups or upheavals that have plagued her neighbours.
Ronnie Liu, of the Democratic Action Party, said: “Socialising between Malays and the other ethnic groups is much rarer than it used to be. You go into coffee shops and restaurants now and they no longer cater to an ethnic mix of customers. It wasn’t like that before.” Some nonMuslim Chinese and Indians feel increasingly treated like second-class citizens. They complain, usually privately, that Islamic religious schools are much better funded than theirs and that a system of affirmative action favours Malays when it comes to university places.
Islam has always had a prominent place. It is the official religion of Malaysia and the Constitution states that anyone born Malay is Muslim.
The debate over the parameters of its role, an old argument in Malaysia, was given a new outing when Najib Razak, the Deputy Prime Minister, broke a taboo to declare that the nation was an Islamic one. He said: “We have never been secular because being secular by Western definition means separation of the Islamic principles in the way we govern the country.”
The Council of Churches of Malaysia afterwards accused him of stirring up racial tension.
Minority religions are particularly worried about a series of apostasy rulings. Chinese or Indians who want to marry a Malay must convert to Islam, causing great problems if they divorce or are widowed and want to return to the religion of their birth.
In a notorious case this year a Malay woman called Lina Joy attempted to have Malaysia’s courts recognise her conversion to Christianity, but failed and was hounded and fled into hiding. Some hardliners have even called for the execution of apostates.
Every state has a religious department with Saudi-style moral enforcers and nowhere are they more active than in Kota Bharu, a city of mosques along a muddy river that bustles during the day but falls silent at nightfall.
Unmarried couples found sharing hotel rooms are hunted down by the enforcers. Couples caught sitting too close together on park benches are fined 2,000 ringgit (£285) in the city’s shariah court under a provision called khalwat ” loosely translated as “close proximity”. Couples have been forced into marriage after being caught together and moral enforcers sometimes pick on foreigners.
NonMuslims as well as Malays also sometimes fall foul of the enforcers in Kuala Lumpur and elsewhere and there are claims that instead of being paragons of Islamic virtue the enforcers are prone to bribery and have recruited vigilantes into their ranks.
In Kota Bharu the enforcers declined to speak to The Times. Mr Hassan explained: “They are worried about being made to look like fools. It could damage the image of Islam if their work is portrayed in the wrong light.”
Nurhayati Kaprawi, of Sisters in Islam, a group that has spoken out against khalwatand the enforcers, said that many of their raids followed anonymous tip-offs. She said that they frequently terrorised people by barging into homes in the middle of the night.
Ms Kaprawi said: “They say they want to implement Islam but the truth is they are really smearing Islam. If they are not stopped they really could become like the Taleban.”

Tuesday, 14 August 2007

Who Is At Fault?

How sad could it be to start a new week by receiving a bad news or making a call to a loved one, only to get another person answering the call and informing that this person is dead? Well, this is what that was faced by some people yesterday when they had their family members killed in an accident. Quoted as "Bus of Death" by The Star online.

It was very sad and pitiful to read something like this in the morning, and I could imagine if how the situation would be if I was one of those people who had made or received the news in the morning.

For all the family of the deceased, my condolences goes to you while for those who cheated death, hopefully you have a speedy recovery and get well soon.

After reading this news both, yesterday and today, it made me wonder whet er this was something avoidable or was it in actual fact an accident. The paper reported that the bus, as I would prefer to say - was not road worthy because the bus is 20 years old. And being an express bus for twenty years, you could just account the mileage clocked by this vehicle. I would imagine that an outdoor sales man to change his car once every three years, and do mind you that he would be clocking in far lesser mileage than an express bus. I am most definitely sure as well that these buses would have been maximized on its mileage to rake in as much profits as it possibly with the least cost by the unscrupulous owner.

Who is to be blamed here for the loss of these innocent lives? Should it be the bus operator, the driver, JPJ, the transport ministry, PUSPAKOM and the list could go on.

After thinking for a while and imagining if I had a lost a family member in this mishap, ideally this would be most probably what I would be doing:

Firstly, I would like to charge the dead driver and hold him accountable for this accident as it looks like this accident was due to reckless driving. And having driven on Malaysian highways at night, I do know how fast these buses travel and how do they drive. Trust me; it's scary

Secondly, I would like to hold the bus owner and operatoe liable for this incident simply because they have failed to secure the safety of their passengers. Pretty much the same concept if you were to board a flight and it crashes, the airline would be held responsible as this looks more like a technical issue with the bus. In addition, they have allowed this driver, with a string of summonses behind him since 1991 plus arrest warrants to drive the bus.

Having done this, I would so want to question JPJ as to what are they going to do about this incident and to prevent future incidents similar to this from happening. Apparently, this bus was not permitted to ply this route. It was only given two routes, Kuala Lumpur - Taiping and Kuantan and Kuala Terrenganu. I would so wish to know what kind of a concrete assuarance can and will we be provided as to what are the measures that will be taken to ensure that these operators would not be driving on routes that they are not permitted to.

The other board that annoyed me would be the Commercial Vehicle Licensing Board. This board ordered the operating license of this comapny would be suspended this afternoon. Common, it should be more like their license should be revoked and measures are to be taken that all their busses would be sealed and they (the owners) be made in such a way that they cannot apply for another business license under a different name. I don't think this is too harsh of a punishment. Afterall, it was their act that has caused the lloss of so many lives.

The prime minister did say that he contacted the works minister and questioned about he condition of the road. The works minister said that the roads were in good condition, I am not sure if he did actually visit the site, but lets just say that he did and the condition was indeed good. It better be, I mean we are paying very high toll rates for using this road. So, this makes PLUS safe as he condition of the road were good. Who is next in the prime minister's list ; the transport minister.

Thursday, 9 August 2007

Pet Cemetery

Since the emergence of the internet, reading The Star online has somewhat become my daily routine. It is a source of mainstream media without half of the advertisement content in it and worrying to pull over by the streets to buy a copy. As I was reading today's paper, there was an article in it which took my attention. I have to admit that it was a rather radical business idea, and I'm not sure of its acceptance, logically, but seeing Malaysians have somewhat evolved to be more 'kiasu' like their Singaporean counterparts, I think it will be a successful venture after all.

Nirvana Memorial Park, which I think is situated in Nilai, you would need to pardon me on this as I almost failed my geography lessons when I was back in school some many years ago, has opened up a 20 000 sq feet pet cemetery which is exclusive for dogs and cats only. The senior marketing manager of the cemetery,oops..I mean park, said that it was designed with a children's theme park in mind since most pet owners' are children. And just like any other thing in Malaysia, nothing comes free - or even cheap. You would need to fork out some RM 6800.00 to have your dead pet collected and then buried, and of course, not forgetting the Malaysian culture, there has to be an early bird special, so it's RM4800.00 now. here
It is a very nice idea, at least someone has finally come to appreciate pets. But the irony of it, is the cost. As stated earlier, it was designed keeping kids in mind as they're the main pet owners, but the charges..I don't think any average kid would be able to fork out Rm6800.00 for their pets burial. Or at least I know that I would not be able to afford that. I wonder how much does it cost to buy a pet nowadays. As I remember, a friend of mine bought a pup for about RM 500.00 only a year ago. Has the price of pets inflated just like almost everything else in Malaysia?
Personally, I don't see a point where I would, even if I could, where I would be spending so much money for my pet to be kept so far away from me, left underground to rot and decay with worms and all other kind of parasites infesting on them. I mean, common..let's be a little bit more logical here as how close are we to our pets. How many Malaysians do actually spend their money on pets. To start of with, we don't even have pet insurance. There isn't a single company out there that I know of who has pet insurance on the table being offered. And I am not going further on this, it could be my next business idea.
Have you ever been to a hypermarket or even to a vet and seen the so very limited choice of pet food available there? When buying pet food there is like limiting yourself to sweetcorn or beetroot as your daily staple. And for the last time, spare me the bullshit of feeding them healthy food. Having carcasses and organs grounded to become either wet or dry pet food, how healthy is that? The other thing is, have you noticed how much Malaysians spend on pet food, the last time I went shopping and stocked my cart up with dog treats, everyone around me was looking at me like I'm an alien from Pluto (it's a planet in our solar system and not the yellow-coloured Disney dog which is always seen with Mickey Mouse).
How many times have we read in the newspapers about animals being abused, and there is nothing much done to the abuser, and SPCA themselves can't do much about the whole issue because the law protecting animals in Malaysia is lacking in every single aspect, similar to mentality of some of its leaders. And instead of fostering animal likeness amongst the residents, one of the city council's of Selangor came up with this 'brilliant' idea of theirs, where you would need to get the consent of neighbours before you could keep a dog and you would also need to live in a certain specific sized house in order to keep your pet. What the f**k is this?
Being so backward in all these, I do not see the logic of jumping all the steps in between and coming up with a burial ground for pets. It is a common thing in certain developed nations to have them, but these countries would literally hang you upside down before ripping you apart if you were to abuse an animal. Although this is a very radical to be, profitable business idea, I personally feel that we are too far behind before we can come up with a cemetery of this sort. It is more important to instill appreciation to the animals and maintaining healthy lifestyle with your pet before thinking of where to bury them and be cool about having spent so much money burying them. Come on, spend you money on you pets while they are still alive rather then when their dead, just like what you should be doing to your parents, and of course make sure the dates on the tombstone is correct to the least.
So, would I ever use this facility to let my two dogs rest in peace in future? - I don't think so. Not only because I can't afford it, but even if I could, I would prefer to have them cremated, and to keep their ashes in an urn, close to me. Then again, this is me...I don't like to be the majority. I prefer doing things differently.

Tuesday, 7 August 2007

Military Privatisation?

As I was lazing on the sofa catching the news last night on BBC, there was one documentation that took my interest. It had to do with the war in Iraq and the Americans. To be honest, I was never bothered by this as it is, to me, pretty much a lame news where innocent lives get killed for no apparent reason. And to my amazement, I came across this poll where they were asking if it was wise for Prince Harry to go to Iraq for the war. Stupid, I would say, to send a royalty to war as this would require more bodyguards for him. But then again, why should not a soldier be sent for war? It's just that you have to make sure he does not serve as a figure there, but to actually get down and dirty.
However, this did not bother me as much as what I saw on TV last night. In the news, they were reporting that America, through an agent in Peru are actually hiring Peru-ans to go to Iraq an serve in the war as security the the troops there. Confused? Don't worry, I'll try to get this in a more simple manner. It's like letting you kids to pick a fight with your your neighbourhood children in the park, only to ask you immediate neighbour's children to take care of yours. Now, how feasible is this idea??
So, here we have the Americans hiring these civilians from Peru for only $33.00 daily to work as security guards. And, before sending them to the battle field, they were only given 4- 5 days of training with weapons. In order to protect the interest of these new employees, the were promised some benefits in case of death or disability. However, they were to also sign an agreement stating that they would not be allowed to sue this company under any circumstances. So, for all these people who got conned into risking their lives for peanuts, were not only not given any compensation upon their return, but hey were also not allowed to take any legal actions against that agent which recruited them. How convenient!
Whats irks me the most is of these rich countries exploiting the poorer nations for their own benefit. Don't they see people from poorer nations as people as well, or are they regarded as some kind beings.
The irony of this whole thing is, if these hired body guards are only guarding the American troops, who is over looking the British troop as this was a joint coalition between USA and UK to invade Iraq under the terrorist banner. Are the British soldiers left to look after their own backs while the Americans are guarded? If yes, then this is some kind of coalition huh! On the other hand, if the British troops are guarded by the same people as well, what the hell has happened to human rights?? Something the Brits are known for. A country that does not believe in capital punishment but allows 3rd world country civilians exploitation, funny isn't it?

Sunday, 5 August 2007

New Operating Hours

I was reading the paper the other day and came across this article about the new operating hours for petrol kiosk. It was about shortening the operating hours of these kiosk and also to start charging the consumers the 1% merchant fee imposed by the banks. Then, there was another article on the papers the next day where these petrol station owners came to a so called "round table" decision to operate the stations from 0700 to 2200 hrs, and this decision was to be implemented within the next two months.

They cited that high operating cost and low security was amongst the reasons for this closure. Then, there was a small tiny little article in the paper as well, challenging the station owners to show that they are not making money and justify their decision. Curious, I decided to read the following day's paper, just to see if there were anything else to this, but I could not find any. As I expected, there weren't much, if not any intervention by the government. This does make sense to certain degree, as the operation of the stations is only a matter of business. However, I did not read anything much after this. Furthermore, a declaration of the profits cold mean bad news to most people, especially those who are working very hard to avoid the tax man. And I do not believe that there would be any pressure on these operators to declare their profit and loss as well, as the declaration may lead to the revelation for other corruption issues which never seem to end.

So, assuming that these stations are going to start operating during these hours after the next two months; to make things easier, let's just say this October, has made me think, after reading a few other blogs, about a few scenarios which could be quite funny and beneficial for the use of some fun.

Now, lets take that you have a date on a Friday evening. You just rush through the traffic on Friday after work, have a quick shower and go fetch your date on time at quarter past 8, before driving to your destination. After dinner and a few drinks; a good two hours spent, you decide to leave the restaurant and hit back home hoping that she would ask you in for some coffee and then be an opportunist from there.

So, here you are midway through your journey and notice that you're running low on gas and unfortunately your car stops just close by to a petrol station. You can't do much can you?, its still quite a distance if you want to walk back, dare not leave you highly paid tax car by the road overnight, can't buy any petrol as the stations close at 10pm, so what do you do? - Well, you could spend the rest of the evening in the car doing nothing or make the most out of it. Either way, since you screwed up, there are very little chance of the girl wanting to go out with you again, so it's best to make full use. After all, I did read one of the local surveys here and found that most couples enjoy having sex at the back of the car.
And, if you get caught by a certain enforcement group or the police, hey..make the full use of the early closure. It wasn't your fault you couldn't do it in your houses or a motel room, the petrol stations closed too early and there wasn't just enough time to fill up your tank after work...dumb morons, can't they make any decision to benefit the public for once and the reasons they gave we also nothing much to do with the general public. Common, security and operating cost...and who losses out?? - stupid idiots



Thursday, 2 August 2007

Finally....I'm blogging

At last, I have been successfully convinced to blog. After years of ignoring pressure from everyone that has been asking me to blog, I have finally decided to give it a shot and see how long it goes before i get tired of this. When I was discussing this with a dear friend of mine yesterday, she asked me, so what are you going to blog about and what is your blog going to be called. And, should I have not forgotten what I told her, do mind you that I'm beginning to have short memory span, my answer was "I don't' know". Having said this to her, I, only then realised that I did use quite a common phrase used by a well known figure in Malaysia, but who cares. This just made me feel more attached to my homeland and that I do have the attitude of, if not all, at least one other Malaysian :).

So, what am I going to blog about? Well, I honestly don't know yet. However, when i did think of the name to call my blog, whilst enjoying my evening ice-chilled beer in the local pub, I wished; I decided to call it "Shocked Noodles Wave". The reason I chose this name when i was scrambling for ideas is because I wanted it to do with what I plan to blog about basically. I, have since decided to write about things or events that catch my interest, make me read them and then share about it here. I am not sure if there is going to be any pattern here on my interest as I do also seem to have a very short attention span for any matter.

For those of you know me well, there isn't much to say about me. However, for the rest, having read the first two paragraphs, you would have realised that I'm pretty much a sarcastic person, by nature. And,some say that they would need to read in between the lines most of the time to really get my shocked noodles, which produced these wave.
This would be my introduction for now, hopefully I haven't bored anyone yet...and we shall grow from here. Please feel free to send me your thoughts,opinions and findings, it may help me with my next article and we can all learn something new. After all, life is a never ending learning curve....